https://cbaionline.org/corpus/files/original/c33c97af0b6cce0f5e6ff8e74824c07b.pdf 02439c61d112667f1cb85755b85c8c0f Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Behind the Scenes at the Crown Office Subject The topic of the resource Crown Office Procedure Description An account of the resource Material relating to the work of the Crown Office. Letter This is used for general correspondence that doesn't fit into a specialized category (e.g., ministerial submissions). Transcript A transcript of the document. <div style="text-align:center;"><em>Extract 1</em></div> <div style="text-align:center;"><em> </em>[Backwards red stamp reading: THIS IS A COPY. ORIGINAL CLOSED UNDER<br />THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION<br />ACT 2000 EXEMPTION.]</div> <br /> <div style="text-align:right;">HOUSE OF LORDS,</div> <div style="text-align:right;">SW1A 0PW</div> <p>From Sir Wilfrid Bourne, K. C. B.</p> <p>Your ref. 911 (38)<br />My ref. C. O. 22/57A</p> <p style="text-align:right;"> 9th September 1980</p> <p style="text-align:center;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Letters Patent</span></p> <span style="background-color:#000000;color:#000000;">████████████████████</span> <p><br />In your letter of the 8th September, you mention the high cost of insertions in the Gazettes. Is there here another minor economy to be effected? I understand that the text of Letters Patent is repeated <span style="text-decoration:underline;">verbatim</span> in each Gazette. Is this necessary? For example, would it be good enough, in our case, if the entry were on these lines:</p> <p>“Letters Patent appointing A., B and C as Counsellors of State were issued under the Great Seal on … September 1980”?</p> <p>There may be some law of the Medes and the Persians that forbids this; but it should save a little money.</p> <p> </p> <p style="text-align:right;"><span style="text-decoration:underline;">J. W. Bourne</span></p> <p></p> <p>Sir Neville Leigh, K. C. V. O.</p> Signatures The person who signed the document even if there isn't a wet-ink signature. Sir Wilfrid Bourne (Clerk of the Crown in Chancery) Recipient(s) Sir Neville Leigh (Clerk of the Privy Council) Ornamentation Describe any ornamentation. Letterhead has black and white Lesser Royal Arms with "LORD CHANCELLOR" beneath along with "From Sir Wilfrid Bourne, K. C. B." and the address. This is an unsigned copy of the original. Special Features This is a place to enter any distinguishing features. Handwritten annotation reading "Extract 1" at the top. Backwards stamp stating that the document was closed under an FOI exemption. The stamp was on an adjoining page, and it gives the exemptions as s. 37., s. 40, and s. 41 and states the record is closed until 2033. First sentence has been redacted with marker (?). Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Letter - Asking the Privy Council Office About Shortening Gazette Notices [1980-09-09] Subject The topic of the resource Great Seal Description An account of the resource Letter from Sir Wilfrid Bourne to Sir Neville Leigh asking about the possibility of shortening the Gazette notices associated with Letters Patent appointing Counsellors of State. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Sir Wilfrid Bourne (Clerk of the Crown in Chancery) Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived LCO 6/3764 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1980-09-09 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Jason Loch Clerk of the Crown in Chancery Clerk of the Privy Council Crown Office Great Seal Procedure